Processing math: 100%

Thursday, August 25, 2016

Equations on Riemann surfaces

Recall that a Riemann surface is a complex 1-manifold M with a complex structure Σ (a class of analytically equivalent atlases on X). Here we consider equations that relate connections and Higgs fields with solutions on Riemann surfaces. Let G=SU(2) (complex 2-matrices with determinant 1) or SO(3) (real orthogonal 3-matrices with determinant 1), θ a Higgs field over M, and  P a principal G-bundle over M.

Definition:
The curvature of a principal G-bundle P is the map
F : A0M(P)A2M(P),ωs(d)(ωs),

where the extension d:AkM(P)Ak+1M(P) is defined by the Leibniz rule, that is d(ωs)=(dω)s+(1)kωs, for ω a k-form and s a smooth section of P.

Since we may write A1=A1,0A0,1 as the sum of its holomorphic and anti-holomorphic parts, respectively (see post "Smooth projective varieties as Kähler manifolds," 2016-06-16), we may consider the restriction of d to either of these summands.

Definition: For a vector space V, define the Hodge star by
 : k(V)nk(V),ei1eikej1ejnk,

so that ei1eikej1ejnk=e1en. Extend by linearity from the chosen basis.

The dual of the generalized connection d is written d=(1)m+mk+1d, where dim(M)=m and the argument of d is in AkM (this holds for manifolds M that are not necessarily Riemann surfaces as well).

Now we may understand some equations on Riemann surfaces. They all deal with the connection , its generalization d, its curvature F, and the Higgs field θ. Below we indicate their names and where they are mentioned (and described in further detail).
Hitchin equationsd|A0,1θ=0[2], IntroductionF+[θ,θ]=0Yang-Mills equationsddθ+[F,θ]=0[1], Section 4dθ=0self-dual Yang-Mills equationFF=0[2], Section 1Yang-Mills-Higgs equationsdF+[θ,dθ]=0[4], equation (1)ddθ=0


Recall the definitions of θ and θ from a previous post ("Higgs fields of principal bundles," 2016-08-24). Now we look at these equations in more detail. The first of the Hitchin equations says that θ has no anti-holomorphic component, or in other words, that θ is holomorphic. In the second equation, the Lie bracket [,] of the two 1-forms is
[θ,θ]=[12f(dz+i dy),12ˉf(dzi dy)]=i4fˉf dxdy+i4fˉf dydxi4fˉf dxdy+i4fˉf dydx=i|f|2 dxdy.

In the Yang-Mills and Yang-Mills-Higgs equations, we can simplify some parts by noting that, for a section s of the complexification of P×adg,
d(θs)=12d(fdxs)+i2d(fdys)=12(dfdxsfdxs)+i2(dfdyfdys)=(i2fx12fy)dxdys12f(dx+idy)θs.

The Hodge star of θ is θ=12f(dyidx), so
d(θs)=12d(fdys)i2d(fdxs)=12(dfdysfdys)i2(dfdxfdxs)=(12fx+i2fy)dxdys+12f(idxdy)iθs.

We could express s=(s1dx+s2dy)s1, but that would not be too enlightening. Next, note the self-dual Yang-Mills equation only makes sense over a (real) 4-dimensional space, since the degrees of the forms have to match up. In that case, with a basis dz1=dx1+idy1,dz2=dx2+idy2 of A1, we have
F=F12dx1dy1+F13dx1dx2+F14dx1dy2+F23dy1dx2+F24dy1dy2+F34dx2dy2,F=F12dx2dy2F13dy1dy2+F14dy1dx2+F23dx1dy2F24dx1dx2+F34dx1dy1.

Then the self-dual equation simply claims that
F12=F34,F13=F24,F14=F23.


Remark:
This title of this post promises to talk about equations on Riemann surfaces, yet all the differential forms are valued in a principal G-bundle over R2 (or R4). However, since the given equations are conformally invariant (this is not obvious), and as a Riemann surface locally looks like R2, we may consider the solutions to the equations as living on a Riemann surface.

References:
[1] Atiyah and Bott (The Yang-Mills equations over Riemann surfaces)
[2] Hitchin (Self-duality equations on a Riemann surface)
[3] Huybrechts (Complex Geometry, Chapter 4.3)
[4] Taubes (On the Yang-Mills-Higgs equations)

No comments:

Post a Comment