Conference topic
This is from a problem session at the 2016 West Coast Algebraic Topology Summer School (WCATSS) at The University of Oregon. Thanks to Tyler Lawson for explaining the material.
Definition: Affine schemes are the category $\Ring^{op}$. An object $R\in \Ring$ becomes an object $\Spec(R)$ in affine schemes, and a ring map $R\to S$ becomes a map $\Spec(S)\to \Spec(R)$, where $\Spec$ denotes the set of prime ideals.
We try to think of $Spec(R)$ as a geometrical object.
Example: Let $k$ be a field and consider the ring
\[
R = k[x_1,\dots,x_n] / (f_1(x_1,\dots,x_n),\dots,f_r(x_1,\dots,x_n)).
\]
$\Spec(R)$ is supposed to be a substitute for the set of solutions to a system of equations
\begin{align*}
f_1(x_1,\dots,x_n) & = 0,\\
\vdots \hspace{.7cm}\\
f_r(x_1,\dots,x_n) & = 0.
\end{align*}
The scheme $\Spec(R)$ has a more precise definition. It consists of a set, a topology, and a sheaf.
1. Set: The underlying set of the scheme $\Spec(R)$ is the set of prime ideals of $R$. For example:
Definition: Affine schemes are the category $\Ring^{op}$. An object $R\in \Ring$ becomes an object $\Spec(R)$ in affine schemes, and a ring map $R\to S$ becomes a map $\Spec(S)\to \Spec(R)$, where $\Spec$ denotes the set of prime ideals.
We try to think of $Spec(R)$ as a geometrical object.
Example: Let $k$ be a field and consider the ring
\[
R = k[x_1,\dots,x_n] / (f_1(x_1,\dots,x_n),\dots,f_r(x_1,\dots,x_n)).
\]
$\Spec(R)$ is supposed to be a substitute for the set of solutions to a system of equations
\begin{align*}
f_1(x_1,\dots,x_n) & = 0,\\
\vdots \hspace{.7cm}\\
f_r(x_1,\dots,x_n) & = 0.
\end{align*}
The scheme $\Spec(R)$ has a more precise definition. It consists of a set, a topology, and a sheaf.
1. Set: The underlying set of the scheme $\Spec(R)$ is the set of prime ideals of $R$. For example:
- if $R = \C[x]$, then the prime ideals are $(x-\alpha)$ and $(0)$;
- if $R = \C[x,y]$, then the prime ideals are $(x-\alpha,y-\beta)$, irreducible polynomials $(f(x,y))$, and $(0)$.
\[
\bigcup_{n=1}^N V(I_n) = V\left(\bigcap_{n=1}^N I_n\right)
\hspace{1cm}\text{and}\hspace{1cm}
\bigcap_{\alpha\in I} V(I_\alpha) = V\left(\sum_{\alpha\in A} I_A\right).
\]
Geometrically, the closed sets are sets of points where one or more identities (like $f(x)=0$) can hold. For example, if $R=\C[x]$, then we have three different closed set types: $\Spec(C[x])$, $\emptyset$, or a finite union of $(x-\alpha_1,\dots, x-\alpha_n)$. Solutions to equations can be one of the following types below.
3. Sheaf: Let $X$ be a set with a topology. $\mathcal O_X$ is the sheaf for which:
Say $R$ is our ring, $\Spec(R)$ our set of primes, and we have some open set $U\subseteq \Spec(R)$. We like to think of it in the following way:
\[
S^{-1}R = \left\{\left[\frac fs\right]\ :\ f\in R, s\in S\right\},
\]
for which $\mathcal O_X(U) = S^{-1}R$ (good enough for today's purposes). Now we have a triple $(\Spec(R),\tau,\mathcal O_X)$, for $\tau$ the Zariski topology, which we call a locally ringed space.
Definition: A scheme is a space $X$ with a topology and a sheaf of rings that is locally isomorphic to $\Spec(R)$.
Since the sheaf has the space $X$ and the topology (through the open sets) encoded in it, we may think of a scheme as a special type of sheaf. Also, isomorphism is meant in the category of locally ringed spaces.
Proposition: Morphisms of schemes $\Spec(R)\to \Spec(S)$ are the same as ring maps $S\to R$.
Example: In the Zariski topology, take $U\subseteq \Spec(k[x,y])$. Locally $U$ looks like it is covered by rings, though that may not be the case globally. Indeed:
Example: Consider projective space $\P^2$, where $[x:y:z] = [\lambda x: \lambda y:\lambda z]$. We may write
\[
\begin{array}{r c c c c c c}
\P^2 & = & U_0 & \cup & U_1 & \cup & U_2. \\
& & [1:y:z] & & [x:1:z] & & [x:y:1] \\
& & \Spec(k[y,z]) & & \Spec(k[x,z]) & & \Spec(k[x,y])
\end{array}
\]
How can we express $U_0\cap U_1$? This is left as an exercise.
\bigcup_{n=1}^N V(I_n) = V\left(\bigcap_{n=1}^N I_n\right)
\hspace{1cm}\text{and}\hspace{1cm}
\bigcap_{\alpha\in I} V(I_\alpha) = V\left(\sum_{\alpha\in A} I_A\right).
\]
Geometrically, the closed sets are sets of points where one or more identities (like $f(x)=0$) can hold. For example, if $R=\C[x]$, then we have three different closed set types: $\Spec(C[x])$, $\emptyset$, or a finite union of $(x-\alpha_1,\dots, x-\alpha_n)$. Solutions to equations can be one of the following types below.
3. Sheaf: Let $X$ be a set with a topology. $\mathcal O_X$ is the sheaf for which:
- to each open set $U\subseteq X$ we get a ring $\mathcal O_X(U)$;
- to each containment $V\subseteq U\subseteq X$ of open sets, there exists a restriction map $\res_{UV}:\mathcal O_X(U)\to \mathcal O_X(V)$;
- the restriction maps are compatible, in the sense that $\res_{VW}\circ \res_{UV} = \res_{UW}$.
Say $R$ is our ring, $\Spec(R)$ our set of primes, and we have some open set $U\subseteq \Spec(R)$. We like to think of it in the following way:
- elements of $R$ are functions;
- elements of $\Spec(R)$ are points where we can evaluate a function $f\in P$ (or where the function vanishes);
- subsets $S\subset R$ are the sets $\{f\in R\ :\ f$ only vanishes at points outside $U\}$.
\[
S^{-1}R = \left\{\left[\frac fs\right]\ :\ f\in R, s\in S\right\},
\]
for which $\mathcal O_X(U) = S^{-1}R$ (good enough for today's purposes). Now we have a triple $(\Spec(R),\tau,\mathcal O_X)$, for $\tau$ the Zariski topology, which we call a locally ringed space.
Definition: A scheme is a space $X$ with a topology and a sheaf of rings that is locally isomorphic to $\Spec(R)$.
Since the sheaf has the space $X$ and the topology (through the open sets) encoded in it, we may think of a scheme as a special type of sheaf. Also, isomorphism is meant in the category of locally ringed spaces.
Proposition: Morphisms of schemes $\Spec(R)\to \Spec(S)$ are the same as ring maps $S\to R$.
Example: In the Zariski topology, take $U\subseteq \Spec(k[x,y])$. Locally $U$ looks like it is covered by rings, though that may not be the case globally. Indeed:
Example: Consider projective space $\P^2$, where $[x:y:z] = [\lambda x: \lambda y:\lambda z]$. We may write
\[
\begin{array}{r c c c c c c}
\P^2 & = & U_0 & \cup & U_1 & \cup & U_2. \\
& & [1:y:z] & & [x:1:z] & & [x:y:1] \\
& & \Spec(k[y,z]) & & \Spec(k[x,z]) & & \Spec(k[x,y])
\end{array}
\]
How can we express $U_0\cap U_1$? This is left as an exercise.
No comments:
Post a Comment