Let Pn be projective n-space with coordinates [x0:⋯:xn]. Cover Pn with affine pieces Ui={xi≠0}, each of which are An, in coordinates (y1,…,yn), where yj=xj/xi. Recall that the canonical bundle of Pn is the n-fold wedge of the cotangent bundle of Pn, or ωPn=⋀nT∗Pn. The canonical bundle for an arbitrary variety is defined analogously.
Definition: Let X be a projective n-dimensional variety. The sheaf of regular functions on X is OX, with OX(U)={f/g : f,g∈k[x1,…,xn]/I(X),g≠0}, and the restriction maps are function restriction.
There is a natural grading on OX, given by deg(f)−deg(g). A shift in the grading may be applied, called a {\it Serre twist}, to get a differently graded (but isomorphic) module: for φ∈OX with deg(φ)=k, set φ∈OX(ℓ) to have deg(φ)=k−ℓ.
Let α=dy1∧⋯∧dyn∈ωPn, which is well-defined on all of Ui. We claim this is well-defined on all of Pn. We check this on the overlap U0∩Un (for nicer notation), but the approach is analogous for Ui∩Uj.
U0={(y1,…,yn) : yi=xi/x0}yi=zi+1zidyi=z1dzi+1−zi+1dz1z21Un={(z1,…,zn) : zi=xi−1/xn}yn=1z1dyn=−dz1z21
Therefore
α=dy1∧⋯∧dyn=z1dz2−z2dz1z21∧⋯∧z1dzn−zndz1z21∧−dz1z21=dz2z1∧⋯∧dznz1∧−dz1z21=(−1)nzn+11dz1∧⋯∧dzn.
Since the transition function has a pole of order n+1 when z1=0, which happens when x0=0, we have that α has a pole of order n+1 at ∞. Therefore ωPn≅OPn(−n−1).
Let X⊂Pn be a smooth hypersurface defined by a degree d equation F(x0,…,xn)=0. On the affine piece U0 this becomes f(y1,…,yn)=F(1,x1x0,…,xnx0) with yi=xi/x0. The total derivative is
∂f∂y1dy1+⋯+∂f∂yndyn=n∑i=1∂f∂yidyi=0,
and since X is smooth, the terms never all vanish at the same time. Let Vi={∂f∂yi≠0}, and set
βi=(−1)i−1∂f/∂yidy1∧⋯∧^dyi∧⋯∧dyn∈ωX,
which is well-defined on all of Vi⊂U0. We claim that the choice of Vi does not matter, and indeed, assuming i<j,
βj=(−1)j−1∂f/∂yjdy1∧⋯∧^dyj∧⋯∧dyn=(−1)j−1+i−1dyi∂f/∂yj∧dy1∧⋯∧^dyi∧⋯∧^dyj∧⋯∧dyn=(−1)j−1+i−1−1∂f/∂yi(∂f∂y1dy1+⋯+^∂f∂yidyi+⋯+∂f∂yndyn)∂f/∂yj∧dy1∧⋯∧^dyi∧⋯∧^dyj∧⋯∧dyn=(−1)j−1+i−1+11∂f/∂yi⋅∂f∂yjdyj∂f/∂yj∧dy1∧⋯∧^dyi∧⋯∧^dyj∧⋯∧dyn=(−1)j−1+i−1+1+j−2∂f/∂yidy1∧⋯∧^dyi∧⋯∧dyn=(−1)i−1∂f/∂yidy1∧⋯∧^dyi∧⋯∧dyn=βi.
Hence βi is well-defined on all of U0, and we call it simply β. Next we claim it is well-defined on all of X. Again we only check on the overlap of U0∩Un. On the affine piece Un this becomes g(z1,…,zn)=F(x0xn,…,xn−1xn,1)=f(z2z1,…,znz1,1z1) with zi=xi−1/xn. We employ the chain rule ∂f∂yi=∂f∂zj∂zj∂yi and the results above to find that
β=(−1)i−1∂f/∂yidy1∧⋯∧^dyi∧⋯∧dyn=(−1)i−1∂f/∂zj⋅∂zj/∂yiz1dz2−z2dz1z21∧⋯∧^dyi∧⋯∧z1dzn−zndz1z21∧−dz1z21=(−1)i−1∂f/∂zj⋅∂zj/∂yi(−1)n−1zn1dz1∧⋯∧^dzi∧⋯∧dzn=(−1)i+n(1z1)d−1(c+⋯)zn1dz1∧⋯∧^dzi∧⋯∧dzn=(−1)i+nzn−d+11(c+⋯)dz1∧⋯∧^dzi∧⋯∧dzn,
for some constant c. This comes from expressing f in terms of the zis and factoring. Since the transition function has a pole of order n−d+1 when z1=0, which happens when x0=0, we have that β has a pole of order n−d+1 at ∞. Therefore ωX≅OX(−n+d−1).
References: Griffiths and Harris (Principles of Algebraic Geometry, Chapter 1.2)
Definition: Let X be a projective n-dimensional variety. The sheaf of regular functions on X is OX, with OX(U)={f/g : f,g∈k[x1,…,xn]/I(X),g≠0}, and the restriction maps are function restriction.
There is a natural grading on OX, given by deg(f)−deg(g). A shift in the grading may be applied, called a {\it Serre twist}, to get a differently graded (but isomorphic) module: for φ∈OX with deg(φ)=k, set φ∈OX(ℓ) to have deg(φ)=k−ℓ.
Let α=dy1∧⋯∧dyn∈ωPn, which is well-defined on all of Ui. We claim this is well-defined on all of Pn. We check this on the overlap U0∩Un (for nicer notation), but the approach is analogous for Ui∩Uj.
U0={(y1,…,yn) : yi=xi/x0}yi=zi+1zidyi=z1dzi+1−zi+1dz1z21Un={(z1,…,zn) : zi=xi−1/xn}yn=1z1dyn=−dz1z21
Therefore
α=dy1∧⋯∧dyn=z1dz2−z2dz1z21∧⋯∧z1dzn−zndz1z21∧−dz1z21=dz2z1∧⋯∧dznz1∧−dz1z21=(−1)nzn+11dz1∧⋯∧dzn.
Since the transition function has a pole of order n+1 when z1=0, which happens when x0=0, we have that α has a pole of order n+1 at ∞. Therefore ωPn≅OPn(−n−1).
Let X⊂Pn be a smooth hypersurface defined by a degree d equation F(x0,…,xn)=0. On the affine piece U0 this becomes f(y1,…,yn)=F(1,x1x0,…,xnx0) with yi=xi/x0. The total derivative is
∂f∂y1dy1+⋯+∂f∂yndyn=n∑i=1∂f∂yidyi=0,
and since X is smooth, the terms never all vanish at the same time. Let Vi={∂f∂yi≠0}, and set
βi=(−1)i−1∂f/∂yidy1∧⋯∧^dyi∧⋯∧dyn∈ωX,
which is well-defined on all of Vi⊂U0. We claim that the choice of Vi does not matter, and indeed, assuming i<j,
βj=(−1)j−1∂f/∂yjdy1∧⋯∧^dyj∧⋯∧dyn=(−1)j−1+i−1dyi∂f/∂yj∧dy1∧⋯∧^dyi∧⋯∧^dyj∧⋯∧dyn=(−1)j−1+i−1−1∂f/∂yi(∂f∂y1dy1+⋯+^∂f∂yidyi+⋯+∂f∂yndyn)∂f/∂yj∧dy1∧⋯∧^dyi∧⋯∧^dyj∧⋯∧dyn=(−1)j−1+i−1+11∂f/∂yi⋅∂f∂yjdyj∂f/∂yj∧dy1∧⋯∧^dyi∧⋯∧^dyj∧⋯∧dyn=(−1)j−1+i−1+1+j−2∂f/∂yidy1∧⋯∧^dyi∧⋯∧dyn=(−1)i−1∂f/∂yidy1∧⋯∧^dyi∧⋯∧dyn=βi.
Hence βi is well-defined on all of U0, and we call it simply β. Next we claim it is well-defined on all of X. Again we only check on the overlap of U0∩Un. On the affine piece Un this becomes g(z1,…,zn)=F(x0xn,…,xn−1xn,1)=f(z2z1,…,znz1,1z1) with zi=xi−1/xn. We employ the chain rule ∂f∂yi=∂f∂zj∂zj∂yi and the results above to find that
β=(−1)i−1∂f/∂yidy1∧⋯∧^dyi∧⋯∧dyn=(−1)i−1∂f/∂zj⋅∂zj/∂yiz1dz2−z2dz1z21∧⋯∧^dyi∧⋯∧z1dzn−zndz1z21∧−dz1z21=(−1)i−1∂f/∂zj⋅∂zj/∂yi(−1)n−1zn1dz1∧⋯∧^dzi∧⋯∧dzn=(−1)i+n(1z1)d−1(c+⋯)zn1dz1∧⋯∧^dzi∧⋯∧dzn=(−1)i+nzn−d+11(c+⋯)dz1∧⋯∧^dzi∧⋯∧dzn,
for some constant c. This comes from expressing f in terms of the zis and factoring. Since the transition function has a pole of order n−d+1 when z1=0, which happens when x0=0, we have that β has a pole of order n−d+1 at ∞. Therefore ωX≅OX(−n+d−1).
References: Griffiths and Harris (Principles of Algebraic Geometry, Chapter 1.2)
No comments:
Post a Comment